Pros and Cons of Xamarin vs Native Mobile Development

Pros and Cons of Xamarin vs Native Mobile Development

When considering how to build iOS and Android applications, many people think that the native languages, Objective-C, Swift, and Java, are the only choice. However, over the past few years, an entirely new ecosystem of platforms for mobile app development has emerged.

Xamarin app development is unique in this space by offering a single language – C#, class library, and runtime that works across all three mobile platforms of iOS, Android, and Windows Phone (Windows Phone’s native language is already C#), while still compiling native (non-interpreted) applications that are performant enough even for demanding games.

Every one of these stages has an alternate list of capabilities and each shift in its capacity to compose local applications – that is, applications that assemble down to local code and that interop easily with the hidden Java subsystem. For instance, a few stages just permit applications to be worked in HTML and JavaScript, while some are low-level and just permit C/C++ code. A few states don’t use the local control toolkits.

Let’s See what is Xamarin?

It’s difficult to disregard Xamarin when discussing the key ways to deal with portable application advancement. Xamarin is a device utilized for cross-platform mobile applications advancement that enables developers to share around 90 percent of code crosswise over real stages. Being a nearly new instrument, it depends on the Microsoft technology stack and right now has a network of over 1.4 million designers.

The platform was built by the designers behind Mono, an open source improvement stage dependent on the .NET Framework, driven by Miguel de Icaza and first presented in 2001. The Xamarin organization was established on May 16, 2011.

Be that as it may, in contrast to its forerunner, Xamarin was made as a business venture until the organization was procured by Microsoft in 2016. Xamarin turned into a prevalent cross-platform item to create mobile applications inside the Microsoft environment. This procurement broke the money related hindrance for utilizing Xamarin. As Microsoft made Xamarin SDK open-source, it turned out to be a piece of Xamarin Visual Studio Integrated Development Environment (we talk about best IDEs to use for Xamarin improvement beneath). What are the fundamental highlights of Xamarin?

C# language:-  Xamarin utilizes a solitary language, C#, to make applications for every mobile platform. In contrast to translated arrangements, for example, Appcelerator Titanium, Xamarin is locally aggregated, which makes it a go-to alternative for building superior applications with a local look and feel.

In view of the .NET structure:-  C# is a development language with solid security composing that keeps code from unforeseen conduct. As C# is one of the .NET system dialects, it very well may be utilized with various helpful .NET highlights, for example, Lambdas, LINQ, and Asynchronous programming (Asynk).

In fact, speaking, Xamarin utilizes C# and local libraries enclosed by the.Net layer for cross-platform application development. Such applications are frequently contrasted with local for the two iOS and Android portable advancement stages regarding execution and client experience. Moreover, Xamarin can use all local and the most recent API access to use fundamental stage capacities in Xamarin applications, for example, ARKit on iOS or Android Multi-Window.

While the code identified with business rationale, database access, and system correspondence can be shared over all stages, Xamarin enables you to make stage explicit UI code layer. Accordingly, Xamarin cross-platform applications look 100% local on any gadget, giving better client experience, when contrasted with nonexclusive half breed applications.

Compilations:- The platform has two noteworthy items: Xamarin.iOS and Xamarin. Android. On account of iOS, the source code is aggregated straightforwardly into local ARM get together code (Ahead-of-Time assemblage), while Android Xamarin applications are first ordered down to Intermediate Language and after that – into local gathering code at runtime (Just-in-Time arrangement). Be that as it may, in the two cases the procedure is robotized and customized to deal with so many issues as memory designation, waste accumulation, and stage interoperability as a matter of course.

Xamarin.Form:- This is used to make models or straight forward mobile apps sharing upto 100% of the code over both iOS and Android.

Xamarin.Mac:- Developers can also use Xamarin.Mac for developing apps for Mac Operating system. 

Platform SDKs:-  Xamarin gives access to stage explicit SDKs (CocoaTouch for iOS and Android SDK) by means of straightforward C# language structure.

Platform explicit code bindings:-  Much of the time developers will almost certainly handle development keep the local look and feel of the separate platforms inside the Xamarin condition. Be that as it may, Xamarin enables you to call existing stage code (for example Quick for iOS) in the event that you should reuse a few modules or understand some stage explicit capacities like standardized identification filtering, PayPal or Google Analytics combination.

Support of wearables:-  Xamarin underpins building applications for Apple and Android Watch gadgets. Developers can utilize Visual Studio both for Mac and Windows to construct iOS Apple Watch applications. Additionally, Xamarin completely bolsters Android Wear.

Xamarin project structure:-  A large portion of the Xamarin-related work is relied upon to be run by means of a Windows advancement PC with Visual Studio and Xamarin installed. The applications can be fixed straight from the work area or on gadgets and emulators. On the off chance that you intend to create iOS applications on Windows, it’s additionally conceivable as Visual Studio associates with the iOS storyboard creator and iOS test system. There’s likewise Visual Studio for Mac which considers running a test system on the Mac or straightforwardly on a fastened iPhone. Investigating is run through Visual Studio.

Like other technology, Xamarin has its own pros and cons. To make an informed decision about Xamarin vs native development, let’s weigh all the pros and cons of the apps developed with Xamarin.

Must Read:- React vs Angular: what to choose for your app in 2019?

Pros of using Xamarin for app development:-

  • Performance close to Native:-

Xamarin enables you to make immaculate encounters utilizing stage explicit UI components. Basic cross-platforms applications for iOS, Android or Windows are constructed utilizing Xamarin. Structures devices, which changes over application UI segments into the platform explicit interface components at runtime. As the utilization of Xamarin.Forms essentially increment the speed of application improvement, it is an incredible choice for business-situated tasks. However, there may be a slight decrease in execution because of the additional reflection layer. For custom application UI and higher execution, you can, in any case, use Xamarin.iOS and Xamarin.Android independently to guarantee superb outcomes.

  • Open source Technology with strong corporate support:-

After the organization was obtained by Microsoft in February 2016, Xamarin authorizing approaches experienced radical changes. Xamarin SDK, including runtime, libraries, and command line tools, has turned out to be open source and accessible for all under the MIT permit as a piece of Visual Studio. By dispensing with the significant hindrance, the expense of permit, Microsoft prepared for the further development of the stage. In addition, headed by Microsoft, and upheld by Unity, JetBrains, and Red Hat, the .NET Foundation when all is said in done and Xamarin explicitly has turned into a dependable and incredible tech stack.

  • One Technology Stack to code for all platforms:-

Xamarin utilizes C# supplemented with dot Net structure to make applications for any mobile platform. In this manner, you can reuse up to 96 percent of the source code accelerating the development cycle. Xamarin additionally does not require exchanging between the development situations: You can fabricate the majority of your Xamarin applications in Visual Studio which totally supplanted Xamarin Studio. The cross-stage improvement instruments are given as an implicit piece of the IDE at no extra expense.

  • Simplified Maintenance:-

Because of its cross-platform application, Xamarin makes maintenance and updates simpler. You can just convey the progressions or updates to the source record and they will be connected to the two iOS and Android applications. In any case, this works just for the applications that utilization Xamarin.Forms or the business rationale, shared code, refresh for Xamarin.iOS and Xamarin.Android applications. Along these lines, it causes you to spare your time and cash while staying up with the latest.

  • Complete Development Ecosystem:-

Xamarin comes in a single bundle with a total improvement toolset, including its very own IDE (Xamarin Studio that is presently supplanted by Visual Studio), the platforms itself (Xamarin SDKs), testing (Xamarin Test Cloud), conveyance and examination (Hockeyapp and Xamarin.Insights) stages. Consequently, you don’t have to put resources into extra devices or coordinate the outsider applications to construct, test and convey your Xamarin applications.

  • Full Hardware Support:-

With Xamarin, your answer gets native-level app functionality. It disposes of all equipment similarity issues, utilizing modules and explicit APIs, to work with regular gadgets usefulness over the stages. Alongside the entrance to stage explicit APIs, Xamarin underpins connecting with local libraries. This takes into consideration better customization and local dimension usefulness with minimal overhead.

  • Xamarin.Forms: Live Player:-

As Xamarin.Forms are gone for quick and frictionless advancement, Microsoft recommends utilizing a Live Player device. It’s an application introduced on real telephones to quickly test and investigate your applications without emulator organization or tying a gadget to a workstation. Upon Live Player establishment a developer filters a QR-code in Visual Studio utilizing a telephone camera, which gives access to a presentation created an application. An application on the telephone synchronizes continuously with the one in Visual Studio. This definitely streamlines all setup and further investigating strategies. Lamentably, Microsoft stopped Live Player support, yet despite everything you can download the application and pair it with Visual Studio.

  • Building apps for Macs with Xamarin.Mac Tools:-

Xamarin.Mac takes into consideration growing completely local Mac applications utilizing C# and .NET. It incorporates similar libraries that are utilized for creating in Objective-C with Xcode. By utilizing Xamarin.Mac joined with Xamarin.iOS and Xamarin.Android, developers can share up to 90 percent of local code crosswise over Android, iOS, and Mac OS. Moreover, Xamarin.Mac incorporates with Xcode, so a designer can utilize the Xcode’s Interface Builder to make an application’s UI.

  • Xamarin.Forms: a framework for simple apps and prototypes:-

Xamarin proposes developers fabricate portable applications in two different ways. The first is to utilize Xamarin.iOS and Xamarin. Android, which is viewed as the principle approach. Utilizing Xamarin.Forms, the Visual Studio Library is the second one. Xamarin.Forms take into consideration fast prototyping or delivering applications with less stage explicit usefulness. That is the reason Xamarin.Forms are the best fit for applications where code sharing could easily compare to custom UI. You’ll have the capacity to make a solitary interface and offer it crosswise over stages without planning for every stage separately. You can likewise construct applications where a few pieces of their UIs are made with Xamarin.Forms and the others are designed utilizing the local UI toolbox.

While Xamarin.Forms remains a trade-off as far as local look and feel contrasted with Xamarin.iOS and Xamarin. Android, there’s a lively network focusing on this instrument. For example, some tech suppliers contribute their libraries like Telerik UI that advance designing capacities giving pre-arranged UI parts.

Also Read:-Importance of Online Reputation Management (ORM) for Businesses

Xamarin Cons to Consider:-

  • Xamarin Ecosystem Problems:-

Clearly, Xamarin people group is essentially littler than those of iOS or Android. Along these lines, finding an accomplished Xamarin engineer could be a test. Despite the fact that the stage is developing its following filled by the help from Microsoft. In view of the information from various sources, Xamarin people group makes 10 percent of the worldwide portable improvement society. In spite of the way that the quantity of Xamarin engineers does not come close to iOS or Android local networks, the stage gives broad help to its designers. In particular, there is a committed instructive stage, Xamarin University, that gives assets and useful preparing to the individuals who are new to this innovation. Utilizing this help, the expectation to learn and adapt for an accomplished C#/.Net architect is insignificant.

  • Larger App Size:-

Contingent upon their sort and multifaceted nature, Xamarin applications are regularly bigger than local ones (the last may be a large portion of the extent of a Xamarin application). A straightforward “hi, world” application for Android may take up to 16 MB, quite a bit of it being utilized by the related libraries, content, Mono runtime, and Base Class Library (BCL) congregations.

  • Basic Knowledge of Native Languages Required:-

When utilizing Xamarin.iOS and Xamarin.Android to manufacture portable applications with a really local look and feel, you will, in any case, need to compose a stage explicit layer of code. In this manner, no less than essential information about local advances (Java/Kotlin for Android and Objective-C/Swift for iOS) is required. This, anyway, doesn’t matter to Xamarin.Forms.

  • Somewhat Delayed Support for the Latest Platform Updates:-

This depends totally on the Xamarin developer team. It’s unimaginable for outsider instruments to give the prompt help to the most recent iOS and Android discharges: it sets aside some opportunity to execute the progressions as well as present new modules, and so on. In spite of the fact that Xamarin professes to give same-day support, there still may be some postponements.

  • Not Suitable for Apps with Heavy Graphics

Xamarin’s primary advantage is the capacity to share your code over the stages. However, you can just share the rationale, UI code will be generally staged explicitly. This makes building amusements, rich custom UI, or complex activities in Xamarin really inconsequential. With a little measure of shared code, Xamarin ends up unviable choice.

  • Restricted Access to Open Source Libraries:-

Native development makes broad utilization of open source advances. With Xamarin, you need to utilize just the segments given by the stage and a few.Net open source assets, confronting the two designers and purchasers. While the decision isn’t exactly as rich all things considered for Android and iOS portable application improvement, the Xamarin Components give a large number of custom UI controls, different diagrams, charts, subjects, and other groundbreaking highlights that can be added to an application in only a couple of snaps. This incorporates worked in installment handling, (for example, Stripe), Beacons and wearables mix, out of the crate message pop-up administrations, distributed storage arrangements, mixed media spilling capacities and substantially more.

What is Xamarin Visual Studio IDE?

On the off chance that you have an inclination that Xamarin is directly for you, you’ll be intrigued to know the primary Xamarin IDEs that can be utilized and how they contrast and one another.

Visual Studio (VS) is a Microsoft Integrated Development Environment, programming utilized for building, troubleshooting, and distributing applications over all stages and gadgets. There are three principles Visual Studio Versions for Xamarin – Visual Studio Community, Visual Studio Professional, and Visual Studio Enterprise. The key components for picking a satisfactory variant are the experience of designers (understudies or expert architects) and their group measure. Developers can create programming for Web, versatile, server, and work area with all forms.

Visual Studio Community:-  is a solid match for understudies, open-source ventures, little advancement groups with up to 5 clients. The Community bundle is likewise useful for groups that are new to Visual Studio. This rendition is free for use.

Visual Studio Professional:-  is a lot of devices and administrations made for expert designers, little groups, and undertaking use. This variant gives ground-breaking highlights to rapidly comprehend your code: demonstrating code references, changes to your code, showing who last altered a technique, or finding whether tests are being passed.

Visual Studio Enterprise:- has solid help devices and administrations. They take into account overseeing complex procedures among improvement and IT activities; following quality with manual and mechanized following apparatuses; access to proficient training; and the whole Microsoft designing and testing biological community. It incorporates Microsoft augmentations for Visual Studio Team Foundation Server and Visual Studio Team Services. In this rendition, Team Foundation Server furnishes you with Test Manager, Package Management, and Private Pipeline.

Visual Studio Online (VSO):- is a lot of instruments, which enables engineers to effectively set up persistent mix crosswise over various stages. Ceaseless coordination is a product practice in which all code changes are promptly tried and incorporated with the fundamental code base. It checks and investigates code rapidly. This variant is likely the most applicable, most intriguing one for portable designers.

Considering Other Options: Xamarin vs Native iOS/Android vs Hybrid Development:-

There are many pitfalls in native vs Xamarin debate. Let’s see how the Xamarin compares to the native development tools and hybrid development platforms (Ionic, PhoneGap/Cordova).

Xamarin Native


Tech Stack

One tech stack, Single codebase (C#.Net, Framework + native libraries. Different Tech stacks for each platform.

One tech stack, single codebase (Javascript, HTML5, CSS)

Code Sharing

Up to 96% with Xamarin.Forms No different code bases.



Complete UI customization is possible for each platform (with Xamarin.iOS and Xamarin.Android) Completely Platform-specific UI

Common UI for all platforms (limited customization capabilities)


Good, Almost close to native Excellent


Hardware Capabilities

High – Xamarin uses platform-specific APIs and supports linking with native libraries High – Native tools have complete support for system capabilities out of the box

Medium – The capabilities can be accessed through third-party APIs and plugins, although there are some risks due to the poor quality and unreliability of most of these tools.

Time To Market

With Xamarin.forms the time to market is fast due to the less customization and extensive codesharing Xamarin.IOS and Xamarin.Android requires slightly more time as the high amount of custom code The time to market for ios or android native app might equal that of Xamarin.Forms or Hybrid tools. Yet building apps for multiple platforms require either prolong time to market or need more developers.

Hybrid solutions offer the fastest time to market thanks to the single code base and minimum customization.

Although hybrid mobile development tools are evolving quickly, despite everything they come up short on the execution and local capacities that Xamarin offers at generally a similar expense. While thinking about the two methodologies, the most well-known predicament is Xamarin versus Ionic or Xamarin versus React Native (additionally observe our story on upsides and downsides of ReactJS and React Native for full clarification of the structure). Be that as it may, the last will, in general, lose because of various limitations in the hidden innovations (web stack).

However, there is a JavaScript-based versatile improvement apparatus that beats cross breed arrangements, at any rate as far as UI. It’s NativeScript. This cross-stage open source structure, supported by Telerik, enables you to actualize local UI and associate with local APIs for better portable experience while utilizing a solitary code base. Its principle contrast is that it utilizes XML markup, which accumulates into Android and iOS local reciprocals, rather than HTML web view.

This methodology fills the hole among local and crosses breed improvement, like the way Xamarin does. The primary distinction between the two instruments lies in the programming dialects they use. So Xamarin versus NativeScript examination ought to be a subject of an increasing point by point investigate.

In the meantime, Xamarin versus local Android/iOS improvement banter is by all accounts significantly progressively confounded: Both choices demonstrate to convey an incentive as far as item quality and execution, the decision ordinarily relies upon the sort of use you need to fabricate.

In any case, in the event that you are searching for a Xamarin choice to assemble a cross-stage portable application, you may be frustrated. While the most broadly utilized cross-stage portable advancement instruments are PhoneGap/Apache Cordova, Ionic Framework, Appcelerator/Titanium, they depend fundamentally on web innovations, for example, HTML5 or JavaScript. That is the reason none of these instruments can have a similar dimension of execution and local usefulness that Xamarin offers.