React Native Vs Flutter VS Ionic

React Native vs Flutter vs Progressive Web Apps (PWA’s)

The mobile app development revolution is growing exponentially. To stay au courant the growing need of the purchasers and businesses, the optimum utilization of niche frameworks and platforms becomes a requirement.

For developing a replacement mobile application for the new business segment, developers need robust technology that creates the time-consuming coding time efficient and easy. Here we offer a fast comparison between Flutter vs React Native vs PWA on different parameters.


Quick comparability of Flutter vs React Native vs PWA

This quick comparison of React Native vs Flutter vs Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) will convince be helpful and quickly identify which framework is going to be a top choice for mobile app development.


Flutter is Google’s UI toolkit for building beautiful, natively compiled applications for mobile, web, and desktop from one codebase. Flutter works with existing code, is used by developers and organizations around the world, and is free and open source. In this code lab, you’ll create an easy mobile Flutter app. If you’re conversant in object-oriented code and basic programming concepts—such as variables, loops, and conditionals—then you’ll complete the code lab. You don’t need previous experience with Dart, mobile, or web programming.

Who’s using Flutter

  • Google
  • Groupon
  • Alibaba Group
  • Capital One
  • Square
  • eBay

Pros :

  • Reload attribute allows checking the code modification’s outcome quickly, also as trying different variations for the simplest application. Develop high-end Android mobile applications in low-end machines.
  • Flutter is responsive. If coded appropriately, you’ll not need to change as per the updating needs.
  • You can make the changes within the variables and UI components, and things will look perfect.
  • React Native allows you to reuse the codebase (or just a neighborhood of it) between iOS and Android.

Cons :

  • No support for the online View widget for your application. it’ll lack this facility.
  • It is not considered for future practice.
  • The Flutter framework is big as compared to the React Native framework.
  • Flutter may be an interface software development kit to create mobile applications employing a single code Dart. it’s integrated with the inbuilt Java Code on Android and Objective C and Swift on iOS.
  • Working with the layout presented by the framework can be challenging. Several characteristics aren’t intuitive to use right from the word go. you’ll have to put in overtime to urge hold of its drawbacks.


React Native

Introduced by Facebook, Reactjs is an open-source JS programming language. This language comes across because of the most preferred solution to putting together applications for multiple platforms. 

Just code once, and therefore the React Native apps help to save lots of development time. With a group of components for both iOS and Android platforms, React Native may be a framework building a hierarchy of UI components to make the JavaScript code.

Who’s using React Native?

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Oculus
  • Coinbase
  • Shopify
  • Tableau

Pros :

  • React native generates a code to the native APIs upfront and thus, it connects with the components of both the operating systems.
  • This reduces the waiting time for changes to show up to zero and saves further development time as well.
  • React Native apps render their UI using native APIs. As a result, their performance is in most cases on par with native iOS/Android apps.
  • React Native is an open-source project.  That means anyone can contribute to the framework. 

Cons :

The lack of out-of-the-box support for several native app functionalities (e.g. push notifications) wouldn’t be a big issue with React Native development.

It’s not a fully cross-platform, single-codebase approach.

If you would like to handle computationally heavy operations, you’ll inject native modules and achieve a very native feel to your app.

React native takes tons of your time to initialize. Even if the rendering is on hi-tech gadgets the run time to initialize may be a lot more.

The steep learning curve for beginners to know the framework.

Regular updates are one of the foremost significant disadvantages, adding to the confusion

Progressive Web Apps (PWA’s)

Progressive web app (PWA) helps develop applications within the same manner as native apps. It comprises application development procedures consisting of an internet stack within the sort of HTML, JS, and CSS. It assists developers with valuable attributes to make a unified user experience within the same manner because it is while using the native platform.

The web is a fantastic platform. Its mixture of ubiquity across devices and operating systems, its user-centered security model, and therefore the incontrovertible fact that neither its specification nor its implementation is controlled by one company makes the online a singular platform to develop software on. Combined with its inherent likability, it’s possible to look at it and share what you’ve found with anyone, anywhere. Whenever you attend an internet site, it’s up-to-date, and your experience thereupon site is often as ephemeral or as permanent as you want. Web applications can reach anyone, anywhere, on any device with one codebase.

Who’s using PWA?

  • Uber
  • Twitter
  • Samsung Magazine
  • Financial Times
  • Pinterest
  • Forbes

Pros :

  • PWA mobile applications replicate communications and navigation like that of native web applications.
  • They work for each user, no matter the browser has chosen because they’re built at the lowest with progressive improvement principles.
  • They adapt to the numerous screen sizes: desktop, mobile, tablet, or dimensions which can later become available.
  • Make it easy to reactivate the appliance due to capabilities like web notifications.

Cons :


  • Progressive apps could seem perfect with their multiple functionalities and speed, but a bit like everything else, they’re not flawless.


  • PWAs consume more battery than native apps.
  • Lack of presence in the stores (there is not any possibility to accumulate traffic from that channel).
  • Limited access to some hardware components of the devices.
  • It is not possible to establish a strong re-engagement for iOS users.

Conclusion :

React Native, Flutter, and Progressive web app development come with a suite of features. It entirely depends on your business goals and technical expertise to select the framework that best meets your needs to create exciting apps. There can’t be one winner as all of them provide robust features with native experiences that have successfully supported huge industry giants. It solely depends on users based on their requirements on what they want from a particular framework keeping in mind all the factors.